From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31593 invoked by alias); 23 May 2011 22:08:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31584 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2011 22:08:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BG,TW_FX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:08:13 +0000 From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/49024] REAL*16 ERFC_SCALED inaccuracy X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: AssignedTo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:12:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg02141.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D49024 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot |unassigned at gcc dot |gnu.org |gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert = 2011-05-23 21:48:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > For 128 bits: do you plan to handle it in libgfortran or directly in > libquadmath? I think one can export another function directly in libquadm= ath, > which should be easier to handle - and yield faster code. I've thought about it a bit, both are fine with me. But=E2=80=A6 I don't ha= ve time to play with Mathematica right now to find the good approximations in each possible range, so I'll unassign myself.