From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 474 invoked by alias); 19 May 2011 17:38:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 464 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2011 17:38:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:37:50 +0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/49051] [C++0x] Doesn't SFINAE away an invalid substitution into toplevel parameter type "T[N]" X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:01:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg01639.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49051 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |SUSPENDED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-19 17:20:44 UTC --- Hmm, the example in 14.8.2p8 does seem to contradict my interpretation of the normative wording. I'll raise this with core.