From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-373845-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26599 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2011 06:00:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 26587 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2011 06:00:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 06:00:40 +0000
From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-49084-4-GU6obVsA8l@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49084-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49084-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg01341.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084

Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-13 06:00:35 UTC ---
Hmm, this is due usage of "%lld" in printf-formatter.  Does following patch fix
your issue?

Index: implicit-zee.c
===================================================================
--- implicit-zee.c      (revision 180840)
+++ implicit-zee.c      (working copy)
@@ -944,10 +944,12 @@
   VEC_free (rtx, heap, zeinsn_del_list);

   if (dump_file && num_ze_opportunities > 0)
-    fprintf (dump_file, "\n %s : num_zee_opportunities = %lld "
-                        "num_realized = %lld \n",
+    fprintf (dump_file, "\n %s : num_zee_opportunities = "
+                       HOST_WIDEST_INT_PRINT_DEC
+                        " num_realized = "HOST_WIDEST_INT_PRINT_DEC "\n",
                         current_function_name (),
-                        num_ze_opportunities, num_realized);
+                        (HOST_WIDEST_INT) num_ze_opportunities,
+                        (HOST_WIDEST_INT) num_realized);

   df_finish_pass (false);
   return 0;