From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28638 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2013 21:44:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 28168 invoked by uid 48); 1 Feb 2013 21:44:15 -0000 From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/49090] provide a way to recognize defaulted template parameters Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 21:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090 --- Comment #10 from Tom Tromey 2013-02-01 21:44:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Does it make sense to you to use DW_AT_default_value as a flag here? That would be fine by me.