public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/49095] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-49095-4-FAtYpkycDT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-49095-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095
--- Comment #8 from Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2011-05-27 15:32:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
>
> BTW, the patch bootstrapped/regtested on both x86_64-linux and i686-linux, I'm
> just running second set of bootstrap without the patch to be able to compare
> how much the patch changed code on gcc itself.
I'd love to hear how well it works - I'm in the middle of a busy merge window
and about to leave for a trip to Japan, otherwise I'd just try to set up a gcc
build myself right now.
(Actually, I have a copy of a git tree, but that one fails with
/usr/bin/ld: ../libiberty/libiberty.a(argv.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S
against `_sch_istable' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile
with -fPIC
and due to the merge window I don't really have time to try to figure it out)
Thanks,
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-27 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-21 3:46 [Bug other/49095] New: " torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2011-05-21 10:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49095] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-21 19:22 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2011-05-21 21:33 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2011-05-27 10:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-27 12:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-27 14:22 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2011-05-27 14:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-27 16:02 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org [this message]
2011-05-27 16:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-27 16:52 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2011-05-29 18:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-29 18:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-29 19:09 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-49095-4-FAtYpkycDT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).