public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/49112] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-49112-4-IrJSJHk1jq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-49112-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-20 19:55:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It can be fixed by this partial revert:
>
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 174415)
> +++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy)
> @@ -964,9 +964,6 @@ resolve_structure_cons (gfc_expr *expr, int init)
>
> t = SUCCESS;
>
> - if (expr->ts.type == BT_DERIVED)
> - resolve_symbol (expr->ts.u.derived);
> -
> cons = gfc_constructor_first (expr->value.constructor);
> /* A constructor may have references if it is the result of substituting a
> parameter variable. In this case we just pull out the component we
Unfortunately this patchlet seems to induce the following testsuite
regressions:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/func_assign_3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/func_result_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_call_7.f03 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_call_8.f03 -O (test for excess errors)
The patch in comment #9, however, seems to be clean.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-20 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-22 16:28 [Bug fortran/49112] New: " jwmwalrus at gmail dot com
2011-05-22 16:31 ` [Bug fortran/49112] " jwmwalrus at gmail dot com
2011-05-22 16:35 ` jwmwalrus at gmail dot com
2011-05-22 17:41 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-22 18:19 ` jwmwalrus at gmail dot com
2011-05-28 10:31 ` [Bug fortran/49112] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-28 10:52 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-28 11:09 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-28 16:31 ` jwmwalrus at gmail dot com
2011-05-30 20:01 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-30 20:11 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-12 12:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-20 19:56 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2011-06-21 12:13 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-21 12:21 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-21 12:27 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 16:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 17:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-27 19:52 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-27 21:57 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-31 10:25 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-05 17:04 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-05 17:07 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-49112-4-IrJSJHk1jq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).