public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/49126] New: timevar_stack faild because define_label
@ 2011-05-23 15:27 zgss278 at 163 dot com
2011-07-24 20:51 ` [Bug c++/49126] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zgss278 at 163 dot com @ 2011-05-23 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126
Summary: timevar_stack faild because define_label
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: zgss278@163.com
when source code like this,I think there is a bug:
int f()
{
goto cleanup:
}
then compiler will go along this path:
|tree poplevel (int keep, int reverse, int functionbody)
-->timevar_start (TV_NAME_LOOKUP);xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-->....
--> pop_labels (block);
|static void pop_labels (tree block)
----> htab_traverse (named_labels, pop_labels_1, block);
|static int pop_labels_1 (void **slot, void *data)
------>pop_label (ent->label_decl, NULL_TREE);
|static void pop_label (tree label, tree old_value)
--------> define_label (location, DECL_NAME (label));
|tree define_label (location_t location, tree name)
----------> timevar_start (TV_NAME_LOOKUP);xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
so at last in:
|void timevar_start (timevar_id_t timevar)
--------------> gcc_assert (!tv->standalone);
failed!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/49126] timevar_stack faild because define_label 2011-05-23 15:27 [Bug c++/49126] New: timevar_stack faild because define_label zgss278 at 163 dot com @ 2011-07-24 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 12:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-24 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2011.07.24 20:51:17 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-24 20:51:17 UTC --- Confirmed. >I think there is a bug: When there is an internal compiler error, it is always a bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/49126] timevar_stack faild because define_label 2011-05-23 15:27 [Bug c++/49126] New: timevar_stack faild because define_label zgss278 at 163 dot com 2011-07-24 20:51 ` [Bug c++/49126] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-25 12:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-28 17:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-02-16 20:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-09-25 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-25 12:26:18 UTC --- On x86_64-linux, I don't see any internal compiler error compiling this. Please double check. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/49126] timevar_stack faild because define_label 2011-05-23 15:27 [Bug c++/49126] New: timevar_stack faild because define_label zgss278 at 163 dot com 2011-07-24 20:51 ` [Bug c++/49126] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 12:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-09-28 17:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-02-16 20:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-09-28 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-28 16:29:57 UTC --- Cannot reproduce. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/49126] timevar_stack faild because define_label 2011-05-23 15:27 [Bug c++/49126] New: timevar_stack faild because define_label zgss278 at 163 dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2011-09-28 17:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-02-16 20:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-16 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WORKSFORME |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-16 20:19:56 UTC --- Marking this as a dup of bug 52248. I can still reproduce this bug in 4.7.0 20120123. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 52248 *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-16 20:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-05-23 15:27 [Bug c++/49126] New: timevar_stack faild because define_label zgss278 at 163 dot com 2011-07-24 20:51 ` [Bug c++/49126] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 12:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-28 17:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-02-16 20:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).