[Bug c++/49132] New: [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[Bug c++/49132] New: [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

           Summary: [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class
                    with const data member
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com
                CC: jason@redhat.com


gcc 4.7.0 20110521 (experimental) in C++0x mode rejects the following code:

//---
struct A {
 const int m;
};

A a1 = {}; // #1
A a2{};    // #2
//---

The error messages at the lines marked with #1 and #2 are:

"error: uninitialized const member 'A::m'"

The code should be accepted, because the objects undergo
aggregate-initialization. The error message is incorrect, the objects are
initialized.

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Aggregate-initialization    |[DR 178]
                   |rejected for class with     |Aggregate-initialization
                   |const data member           |rejected for class with
                   |                            |const data member

--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 22:17:51 UTC ---
This was clarified to be well-formed as part of DR 178.

http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html#178

[Bug c++/49132] [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 22:08:46 UTC ---
It's annoying how GCC bugzilla tends not to send mail to people when I add them
to CC even if I also add a comment.  Anyway, Fabien, please take a look at this
bug.

[Bug c++/49132] [4.6/4.7 regression] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |4.5.1
            Summary|[C++0x]                     |[4.6/4.7 regression]
                   |Aggregate-initialization    |Aggregate-initialization
                   |rejected for class with     |rejected for class with
                   |const data member           |const data member
      Known to fail|                            |4.6.0, 4.7.0

--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 22:11:49 UTC ---
This is a regression relative to 4.5 in C++98/03 mode as well (the a1
declaration).

[Bug c++/49132] [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.05.23 22:07:23
                 CC|                            |fabien at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 22:07:23 UTC ---
Yes.  process_init_constructor_record shouldn't complain about uninitialized
const members, because within aggregate initialization, members without
explicit initializers are value-initialized.  Fabien?

[Bug c++/49132] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
      Known to work|4.5.1                       |
            Summary|[4.6/4.7 regression]        |Aggregate-initialization
                   |Aggregate-initialization    |rejected for class with
                   |rejected for class with     |const data member
                   |const data member           |
      Known to fail|                            |2.95, 3.0, 4.0.4

--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 22:14:39 UTC ---
Actually it isn't a regression, it's broken as far back as 2.95.

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 23:16:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It's annoying how GCC bugzilla tends not to send mail to people when I add them
> to CC even if I also add a comment.  Anyway, Fabien, please take a look at this
> bug.

GCC bugzilla mails seem to go out in random order with arbitrarily long delays
recently, so the "New" bug mail sometimes appears in the archives several
minutes after the first comment on a bug. very annoying

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[fabien at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|jason at redhat dot com            |
           Assignee|fabien at gcc dot gnu.org          |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Mine.

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[paolo at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jun 25 14:27:35 2014
New Revision: 211981

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-06-25  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

    DR 178
    PR c++/49132
    * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Do not complain about
    uninitialized const members, because within aggregate-initialization,
    members without explicit initializers are value-initialized.

/testsuite
2014-06-25  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

    DR 178
    PR c++/49132
    * g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr1.C: New.
    * g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr2.C: Likewise.
    * g++.dg/init/aggr11.C: Likewise.
    * g++.dg/init/aggr12.C: Likewise.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr1.C
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr2.C
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/aggr11.C
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/aggr12.C
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
           Assignee|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com    |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.10.0

--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Fixed for 4.10.0.

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ppluzhnikov at google dot com

--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
*** Bug 61581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***