public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/49170] New: [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:35:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-49170-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170 Summary: [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org CC: wschmidt@gcc.gnu.org Host: *-*-solaris2.[89] Target: *-*-solaris2.[89] Build: *-*-solaris2.[89] Between 20110523 and 20110525, several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8 and 9 (both SPARC and x86) that lacks cexp in libm: FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/13450.cc (test for excess errors) Excess errors: Undefined first referenced symbol in file cexp /var/tmp//ccvyjKLM.o cexpf /var/tmp//ccvyjKLM.o cexpl /var/tmp//ccvyjKLM.o ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to ./13450.exe Comparing -save-temps output before and after the patch, I find no changes to the .ii file, no calls to cexp before the patch, but calls after. I very strongly suspect this patch: 2011-05-24 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> PR tree-optimization/46728 * tree-ssa-math-opts.c (powi_table): New. (powi_lookup_cost): New. (powi_cost): New. (powi_as_mults_1): New. (powi_as_mults): New. (gimple_expand_builtin_powi): New. (execute_cse_sincos): Add switch case for BUILT_IN_POWI. (gate_cse_sincos): Remove sincos/cexp restriction. Please fix. Rainer
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 11:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-05-26 11:35 ro at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-05-26 12:14 ` [Bug tree-optimization/49170] " wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 12:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 13:44 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-27 10:16 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-27 10:32 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-27 13:32 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 15:16 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-49170-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).