From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11526 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2011 11:08:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 11507 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2011 11:08:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:07:54 +0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/49253] New: [4.7 Regression] Debug-mode forward_list broken X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:08:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D49253 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Debug-mode forward_list broken Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: paolo.carlini@oracle.com Something changed either in the front-end or the middle end over the next couple of days which broke the debug-mode forward_list, like this: ...debug/forward_list:650:25: error: request for member =E2=80=98__gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator_base::_M_prior=E2=80=99 in =E2=80=98__= rhs_iterators->=E2=80=99, which is of non-class type =E2=80=98__gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator_base*=E2=80=99 To reproduce just compile, with -std=3Dc++0x -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG: //////////// #include //////////// No recent changes to the library itself can possibly have caused this. HJ, can you search the offending patch?