public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-49263-4-yNp5B0WG5g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-49263-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263

--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-22 22:34:04 UTC ---
Yes, that peephole doesn't catch all the patterns which could
make tst #imm8,r0 use.  Perhaps it would be a good idea to get
numbers for the test like CSiBE test with the vanilla and new
insns/peepholes patched compilers.  Something covers 80% of
the possible cases in the usual working set, it would be enough
successful for such a micro-optimization, I guess.

Cost patch looks fine to me.  Could you propose it as a separate
patch on gcc-patches list with an appropriate ChangeLog entry?
When proposing it, please refer how you've tested it.  Also
the numbers got with the patch are highly welcome.

BTW, do you have FSF copyright assignment for your GCC work?
Although the cost patch itself is essentially several lines which
doesn't require copyright assignment, the other changes you've
proposed clearly require the paper work, I think.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-22 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-01 20:17 [Bug target/49263] New: " oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-06-01 20:42 ` [Bug target/49263] " oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-06-12 23:12 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-19 16:42 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-06-22 22:34 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2011-06-26 22:31 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-06-27  5:15 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-09 23:35 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-10-10  1:32 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-10 23:48 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-10-11  1:47 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-13 22:55 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-10-14 23:06 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-15  2:33 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-20 14:20 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-12-29  1:09 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2012-02-26 16:28 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-26 23:29 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-27 19:52 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-28 22:02 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-31 13:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-08 13:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 12:37 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-30 18:45 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-24 13:05 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-26 23:57 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12 11:46 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-23 12:34 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-23 12:35 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-23 19:05 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 11:40 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-24 11:57 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 13:34 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-24 15:00 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-25 17:53 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-25 21:32 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-26 12:03 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-26 17:44 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-28 10:24 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-28 10:48 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 14:54 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-30  1:48 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-30  1:56 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-30 12:42 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-05-30 19:57 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-30 20:00 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-49263-4-yNp5B0WG5g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).