From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-361443-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29937 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2011 12:34:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 29897 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2011 12:34:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:33:56 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/49278] ICE (segfault) when combining DATA with default initialization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-49278-4-DpfxVqdquk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:34:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02969.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|ice-on-valid-code           |ice-on-invalid-code
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.06.30 12:33:12
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-30 12:33:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> J3 subgroup has answered this:
> http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/195/11-201r1.txt

Thanks. In a nutshell: It is invalid - the standard does not allow to combine
partial default-initialization with partial DATA initialization.

It is not a constraint, hence, the compiler is not required to diagnose it, but
I think it should - rather than ICEing ...