From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-359270-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6555 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2011 18:29:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 6547 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2011 18:29:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:29:39 +0000
From: "edwintorok at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/49347] G++-4.6 Solaris incorrectly defines _RESTRICT_KYWD to __restrict
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: edwintorok at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49347-4-Gb5toGSiqi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49347-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49347-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:29:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00796.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D49347

--- Comment #2 from T=C3=B6r=C3=B6k Edwin <edwintorok at gmail dot com> 201=
1-06-09 18:29:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> >=20
> > Don't know where the #define to __restrict on __cplusplus comes from, b=
ut it is
> > wrong.
>=20
> No, it's correct, see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Restricted-Pointers.html
>=20
>=20
> The bug is that G++ can't parse __restrict in an array parameter:
>=20
> extern int f( char *const envp[__restrict] );
>=20
> The C front end accepts this, but not the C++ one.

Is that planned to be fixed for the next release?
If not then as a workaround that fix-includes header could #define
_RESTRICY_KYWD to empty.