public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/49374] New: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken
@ 2011-06-11 16:21 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-06-11 16:28 ` [Bug target/49374] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-06-11 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374
Summary: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
CC: ubizjak@gmail.com
On Linux/ia32, revision 174953 gave:
New failures:
FAIL: ./array-1.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./array-1.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./array-1.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./empty.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./empty.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./empty.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./externc-1.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./externc-1.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./externc-1.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./local-1.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./local-1.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./local-1.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./pch.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./pch.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./pch.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./static-1.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./static-1.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./static-1.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./system-1.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./system-1.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./system-1.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./system-2.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./system-2.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./system-2.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./template-1.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./template-1.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./template-1.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./uninst.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./uninst.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./uninst.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./wchar-1.H -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./wchar-1.H -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ./wchar-1.H -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 12)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 14)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 15)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 16)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 17)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/asmgoto-4.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used-2.c (test for warnings, line 8)
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/builtin-offsetof.c (test for errors, line 21)
FAIL: c-c++-common/builtin-offsetof.c (test for errors, line 28)
FAIL: c-c++-common/builtin-offsetof.c (test for warnings, line 25)
FAIL: c-c++-common/builtin-offsetof.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/dwarf2/pr43190.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/dwarf2/vla1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr36513-2.c (test for excess errors)
....
Revision 174635 is OK. It may be caused by revision 174951:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-06/msg00440.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken
2011-06-11 16:21 [Bug target/49374] New: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-06-11 16:28 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-06-12 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-06-11 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-06-11 16:27:59 UTC ---
It could be my setup problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken
2011-06-11 16:21 [Bug target/49374] New: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-06-11 16:28 ` [Bug target/49374] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-06-12 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-12 11:46 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2011-06-12 14:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken
2011-06-11 16:21 [Bug target/49374] New: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-06-11 16:28 ` [Bug target/49374] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-06-12 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-12 11:46 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2011-06-12 14:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2011-06-12 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2011-06-12 11:45:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Revision 174635 is OK. It may be caused by revision 174951:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-06/msg00440.html
Huh?
Unless these testcases depend on totally broken vec_dupv4sf pattern, I
sincerely doubt that my patch could trigger these errors. And we don't
vectorize at -O2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken
2011-06-11 16:21 [Bug target/49374] New: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-06-12 11:46 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2011-06-12 14:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-06-12 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-06-12 14:30:31 UTC ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 49375 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-12 14:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-11 16:21 [Bug target/49374] New: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-06-11 16:28 ` [Bug target/49374] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-06-12 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-12 11:46 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2011-06-12 14:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).