From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-359573-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7812 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2011 11:19:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 7803 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2011 11:19:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:28 +0000
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/49389] New: [C++0x] Wrong value category for pointer-to-member expression with rvalue object expression
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49389-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01099.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49389

           Summary: [C++0x] Wrong value category for pointer-to-member
                    expression with rvalue object expression
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com
                CC: jason@redhat.com


gcc 4.7.0 20110611 (experimental) in C++0x mode rejects the following program
at the line marked with #:

//----
template<class T>
T&& val();

struct A {};

typedef decltype(val<A>().*val<int A::*>()) type;

template<class>
struct assert_type;

template<>
struct assert_type<int&&> {};

assert_type<type> test; // #
//----

"error: aggregate 'assert_type<int&> test' has incomplete type and cannot be
defined"

Further testing reveals that the deduced type is 'int&' instead of 'int&&'.

According to my reading of 5.5 [expr.mptr.oper] p6:

"The result of a .* expression whose second operand is a pointer to a data
member is of the same value category (3.10) as its first operand."

we have an xvalue expression val<A>() as the first operand, which should result
in an xvalue expression category for the complete pointer-to-member expression.

Referring to 7.1.6.2 [dcl.type.simple] p4, we should fall into bullet 2:

"otherwise, if e is an xvalue, decltype(e) is T&&, where T is the type of e;"

which should have the effect of returning int&&, not int&. Therefore gcc should
accept this program.