public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code
@ 2011-06-14 19:15 dcb314 at hotmail dot com
  2011-06-14 22:34 ` [Bug c++/49409] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dcb314 at hotmail dot com @ 2011-06-14 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

           Summary: some possible new warnings for strange code
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: dcb314@hotmail.com


Consider the following code

extern void g( int);

void f( int i)
{
    if (i == i) // same thing compared
        g( i);

    if (i != i) // same thing compared
        g( 2 * i);

    if ((i - i) > 10)   // X - X == 0, unless volatile
        g( 3 * i);

    if (i || i) // duplicates in ||
        g( 4 * i);

    if (i && i) // duplicates in &&
        g( 5 * i);
}

I ran the above code through the C++ compiler, with warning flags -Wall
-Wextra and it was surprisingly silent.

Would it be worthwhile for g++ to warn about some, all or none of
the above coding errors ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/49409] some possible new warnings for strange code
  2011-06-14 19:15 [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code dcb314 at hotmail dot com
@ 2011-06-14 22:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-06-15 10:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-14 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-14 22:34:34 UTC ---
some warnings would seem sensible to me

I tried clang++ which only warns about the first two, via
-Wtautological-compare


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/49409] some possible new warnings for strange code
  2011-06-14 19:15 [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code dcb314 at hotmail dot com
  2011-06-14 22:34 ` [Bug c++/49409] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-15 10:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-08-12 14:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-15 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.06.15 10:03:26
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-15 10:03:26 UTC ---
confirmed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/49409] some possible new warnings for strange code
  2011-06-14 19:15 [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code dcb314 at hotmail dot com
  2011-06-14 22:34 ` [Bug c++/49409] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-06-15 10:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-08-12 14:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  2015-08-12 15:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2015-08-12 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |polacek at redhat dot com

--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Maybe Marek is interested (beyond -Wtautological-compare)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/49409] some possible new warnings for strange code
  2011-06-14 19:15 [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code dcb314 at hotmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-12 14:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2015-08-12 15:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-08-12 17:42 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-12 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With -Wall -Wlogical-op we warn for all the cases except "if ((i - i) > 10)"
and I'm not sure if we really want a warning for this case.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/49409] some possible new warnings for strange code
  2011-06-14 19:15 [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code dcb314 at hotmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-12 15:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-08-12 17:42 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  2015-08-12 18:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-08-12 18:10 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2015-08-12 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Marek, could you please add to the audit trail which warnings work in which
version of GCC? Thanks in advance!

About the remaining case, I would be tempted to close the bug or maybe we could
first ask other maintainers...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/49409] some possible new warnings for strange code
  2011-06-14 19:15 [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code dcb314 at hotmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-12 17:42 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2015-08-12 18:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-08-12 18:10 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-12 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
-Wtautological-compare has been added to GCC 6.  -Wlogical-op is older, but the
part of it that warns about "i && i" is new and has only been added to GCC 6.

I agree about closing the bug now, BTW.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/49409] some possible new warnings for strange code
  2011-06-14 19:15 [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code dcb314 at hotmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-12 18:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-08-12 18:10 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-12 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I meant "agree with closing".


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-12 18:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-14 19:15 [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2011-06-14 22:34 ` [Bug c++/49409] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-15 10:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-12 14:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2015-08-12 15:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-12 17:42 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2015-08-12 18:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-12 18:10 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).