From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-359730-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23335 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2011 19:15:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 23326 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2011 19:15:54 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:15:40 +0000
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/49409] New: some possible new warnings for strange code
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49409-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:15:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01256.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409

           Summary: some possible new warnings for strange code
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: dcb314@hotmail.com


Consider the following code

extern void g( int);

void f( int i)
{
    if (i == i) // same thing compared
        g( i);

    if (i != i) // same thing compared
        g( 2 * i);

    if ((i - i) > 10)   // X - X == 0, unless volatile
        g( 3 * i);

    if (i || i) // duplicates in ||
        g( 4 * i);

    if (i && i) // duplicates in &&
        g( 5 * i);
}

I ran the above code through the C++ compiler, with warning flags -Wall
-Wextra and it was surprisingly silent.

Would it be worthwhile for g++ to warn about some, all or none of
the above coding errors ?