From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-359958-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19719 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2011 20:09:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 19685 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2011 20:09:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:08:48 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/49444] IV-OPTs changes an unaligned loads into aligned loads incorrectly
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49444-4-9bG7oejr2R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49444-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49444-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:09:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01484.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-16 20:08:43 UTC ---
Well, I'm 100% sure this is just the age-old bug that GCC can't expand
misaligned indirect-refs (or nowadays mem-refs and target-mem-refs) on
strict-align targets properly.

Try the following on any GCC version:

typedef int myint __attribute__((aligned(1)));

int foo(myint *p)
{
  return *p;
}
int main()
{
  char c[5] = {};
  return foo(&c[1]);
}

it'll fault on any strict-align target since forever.  Now it would
indeed be nice if _finally_ somebody would go and fix that ...

Dup of ....