From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-360741-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12416 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2011 22:45:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 12401 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2011 22:45:14 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:45:00 +0000
From: "jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/49537] New: cross-check DW_AT_name vs. demangling of linkage names
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:45:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02267.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49537

           Summary: cross-check DW_AT_name vs. demangling of linkage names
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: debug
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
                CC: dodji@gcc.gnu.org


PR debug/49408 shows DW_AT_name "K<&S::m>" vs. demangled
DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name prefix "K<&(S::m(int))>".  This was due to a bug in
libiberty/cp-demangle.c.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-06/msg00308.html
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat.com> wrote:
> Well, the basic issue is that the "linkage name" is produced
> by libiberty/cp-demangle.c and the DW_AT_name is produced by gcc/cp/error.c,
> and they don't always agree on the same pretty-printed representation
> of a C++ expression.

Therefore I believe there could be compile time sanity cross-check with ICE in
such cases, maybe more such bugs exist there already.