From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-361227-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4624 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2011 16:55:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 4612 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2011 16:55:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:55:19 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49565-4-Sa2RhtrlJo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:55:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02753.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-28 16:55:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
>   /* For Fortran multidimensional arrays use DW_ORD_col_major ordering.  */
>   if (is_fortran ()
>       && TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE
>       && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (type)) == ARRAY_TYPE
>       && !TYPE_STRING_FLAG (TREE_TYPE (type)))
>     add_AT_unsigned (array_die, DW_AT_ordering, DW_ORD_col_major);

It's too warm to think poperly: TREE_CODE (type) is ARRAY_TYPE but
TREE_CODE(TREE_TYPE(type)) is INTEGER_TYPE - not an ARRAY_TYPE; hence the code
is never executed. Nevertheless, the issue is presumably related to type having
TYPE_STRING_FLAG set, but TREE_TYPE(type) having it not.