From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-361420-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23477 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2011 09:55:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 23468 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2011 09:55:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:54:51 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug regression/49572] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c scan-tree-dump-times cddce2 ".rtmem" 0
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: regression
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49572-4-Kz6NY2kViT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:55:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02946.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572

--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-06-30 09:54:49 UTC ---
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572
> 
> Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-30 09:01:00 UTC ---
> > After tuplification, DOM records the type of the LHS of assignment statements
> > as the type of the expression.  And then it tests the compatibility of these
> > types.
> 
> Maybe DOM could use the type of the RHS instead in the GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS case.

For loads yes.