From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-364770-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16196 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2011 16:50:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 16178 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2011 16:50:17 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:50:01 +0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/49591] [OOP] Multiple identical specific procedures in type-bound operator not detected
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Summary Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-49591-4-2ABESNMnaQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49591-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49591-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:50:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.08.04 16:49:55
            Summary|[OOP] Multiple identical    |[OOP] Multiple identical
                   |specific procedures in      |specific procedures in
                   |type-bound generic not      |type-bound operator not
                   |detected                    |detected
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 16:49:55 UTC ---
Adjusting title. The problem really only applies to (type-bound) *operators*,
right?