public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/49624] New: ICE with pointer-bound remapping
@ 2011-07-04 7:00 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-15 15:31 ` [Bug fortran/49624] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-04 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49624
Summary: ICE with pointer-bound remapping
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org
Assume:
integer, target :: A(100)
integer,pointer :: P(:,:)
p(10,1:) => A
end
Compiling the program with gfortran results in:
test.f90:4:0: internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:5081
While the following variant gives:
p(1:10,1:) => A
1
Error: Either all or none of the upper bounds must be specified at (1)
Also the valid "p(1:10,1:10) => A" works.
I think the compiler is right about rejecting the code, one finds:
R733 pointer-assignment-stmt
is data-pointer-object [ (bounds-spec-list) ] => data-target
or data-pointer-object (bounds-remapping-list ) => data-target
[...]
R735 bounds-spec is lower-bound-expr :
R736 bounds-remapping is lower-bound-expr : upper-bound-expr
C716 (R733) If bounds-spec-list is specified, the number of bounds-specs
shall equal the rank of data-pointer-object.
C717 (R733) If bounds-remapping-list is specified, the number of
bounds-remappings shall equal the rank of data-pointer-object.
C718 (R733) If bounds-remapping-list is not specified, the ranks of
data-pointer-object and data-target shall be the same.
Thus, for bounds remapping both lower and upper bounds are required.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/49624] ICE with pointer-bound remapping
2011-07-04 7:00 [Bug fortran/49624] New: ICE with pointer-bound remapping burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-15 15:31 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-17 14:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-17 14:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-15 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49624
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-15 15:31:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> p(10,1:) => A
The problem is that "10" is parsed as DIMEN_ELEMENT such that ar.start is set
and ar.end is not. Thus, for the resolver, it is regarded as (10:,1:).
Patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
@@ -3286,7 +3286,7 @@ gfc_check_pointer_assign (gfc_expr *lvalue, gfc_expr
*rvalue)
upper bounds are present, we may do rank remapping. */
for (dim = 0; dim < ref->u.ar.dimen; ++dim)
{
- if (!ref->u.ar.start[dim])
+ if (!ref->u.ar.start[dim]
|| ref->u.ar.dimen_type[dim] != DIMEN_RANGE)
{
gfc_error ("Lower bound has to be present at %L",
&lvalue->where);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/49624] ICE with pointer-bound remapping
2011-07-04 7:00 [Bug fortran/49624] New: ICE with pointer-bound remapping burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-15 15:31 ` [Bug fortran/49624] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-17 14:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-17 14:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-17 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49624
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-17 14:52:50 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jul 17 14:52:46 2011
New Revision: 176370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176370
Log:
2011-07-17 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/49624
* expr.c (gfc_check_pointer_assign): Fix checking for invalid
pointer bounds.
2011-07-17 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/49624
* gfortran.dg/pointer_remapping_7.f90: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pointer_remapping_7.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/49624] ICE with pointer-bound remapping
2011-07-04 7:00 [Bug fortran/49624] New: ICE with pointer-bound remapping burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-15 15:31 ` [Bug fortran/49624] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-17 14:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-17 14:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-17 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49624
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-17 14:57:47 UTC ---
FIXED on the 4.7 trunk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-17 14:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-04 7:00 [Bug fortran/49624] New: ICE with pointer-bound remapping burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-15 15:31 ` [Bug fortran/49624] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-17 14:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-17 14:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).