From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-443367-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7084 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2014 09:20:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7037 invoked by uid 55); 12 Feb 2014 09:20:48 -0000
From: "paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/49636] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct confused with slightly complicated case
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49636-4-GEeaf3r3l9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01124.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636

--- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> ---
 Dear Dominique,

Thanks for the heads-up about -m32 - I thought that the code would be
immune to word length changes ***sigh***

Cheers

Paul

On 12 February 2014 00:40, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636
>
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
>> Created attachment 32098 [details]
>> A fix for this problem
>
> AFAICT it fixes the problem for 64 bit mode only. In 32 bit mode the ICE is
> gone, but I get at run time
>
> i_good=         1         3         5
>  i_bad=         1**********         3
>
>> I am sure that this trick will fix pr57019 too.  This latter is claimed
>> to be a regression but I am sure that it never worked :-)  Nonetheless,
>> I will take advantage of the regression label!
>>
>> I will work on it tomorrow night.
>>
>> By the way, this patch regtests OK on trunk.  I have to make sure
>> that substrings of character arrays work OK with ASSOCIATE.
>
> Did you regtest with -m32? I see gfortran.dg/associated_target_5.f03 failing at
> execution time with -m32, as well as the first test in pr57522
>
>            0           1           2           3
>            0           4           1           5
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
> You are the assignee for the bug.