public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
@ 2011-07-05 15:35 orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-05 15:42 ` [Bug c/49644] [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted to complex " orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: orion at cora dot nwra.com @ 2011-07-05 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
Summary: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted
operand is incorrect.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: orion@cora.nwra.com
#include <stdio.h>
#include <complex.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
double data[6] = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0},*d;
double complex *c, s = 3.0 + 0.0I;
int i;
d=data;
for (i = 0; i<6; i++) {
printf("c(%p), d(%p)=%lf\n",c,d,*d);
*c++ = *d++ * s;
}
return 0;
}
With gcc 4.4.5 (compiles without warnings with -Wall):
c(0x7fff16e86a00), d(0x7fff16e868d0)=1.000000
c(0x7fff16e86a10), d(0x7fff16e868d8)=2.000000
c(0x7fff16e86a20), d(0x7fff16e868e0)=3.000000
c(0x7fff16e86a30), d(0x7fff16e868e8)=4.000000
c(0x7fff16e86a40), d(0x7fff16e868f0)=5.000000
c(0x7fff16e86a50), d(0x7fff16e868f8)=6.000000
With gcc 4.5.1 and 4.6.0:
c(0x7fff5411f2f0), d(0x7fff5411f1c0)=1.000000
c(0x7fff5411f300), d(0x7fff5411f1d0)=3.000000
c(0x7fff5411f310), d(0x7fff5411f1e0)=5.000000
c(0x7fff5411f320), d(0x7fff5411f1f0)=0.000000
c(0x7fff5411f330), d(0x7fff5411f200)=0.000000
c(0x7fff5411f340), d(0x7fff5411f210)=0.000000
It appears that the right hand side pointer is being incremented at the rate
of its promoted size. If you remove the " * s" from the increment line, the
code works as expected. Same problem with 32-bit and 64-bit machines.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted to complex operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
@ 2011-07-05 15:42 ` orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-05 15:42 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: orion at cora dot nwra.com @ 2011-07-05 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
Orion Poplawski <orion at cora dot nwra.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] |[ 4.5/4.6 Regression ]
|post-increment of promoted |post-increment of promoted
|operand is incorrect. |to complex operand is
| |incorrect.
--- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski <orion at cora dot nwra.com> 2011-07-05 15:41:08 UTC ---
May only apply to complex variables. I can't reproduce with promotion of float
to double.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-05 15:42 ` [Bug c/49644] [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted to complex " orion at cora dot nwra.com
@ 2011-07-05 15:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-05 19:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-05 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work| |4.4.6
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed| |2011.07.05 15:41:41
CC| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] |[4.5/4.6 Regression]
|post-increment of promoted |post-increment of promoted
|to complex operand is |operand is incorrect.
|incorrect. |
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-05 15:41:41 UTC ---
The frontend generates
*c++ = COMPLEX_EXPR <*d++ * REALPART_EXPR <SAVE_EXPR <s>>, *d++ *
IMAGPART_EXPR <SAVE_EXPR <s>>>;
and thus increments d twice.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-05 15:42 ` [Bug c/49644] [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted to complex " orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-05 15:42 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-05 19:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-05 20:02 ` orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-05 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-05 19:46:30 UTC ---
The testcase looks wrong though, I don't see c being initialized anywhere.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-05 19:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-05 20:02 ` orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-07 9:55 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: orion at cora dot nwra.com @ 2011-07-05 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski <orion at cora dot nwra.com> 2011-07-05 20:01:27 UTC ---
Yeah, I screwed that up. But it doesn't make any difference to the problem.
This should be correct though.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <complex.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
double data[6] = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0},*d;
double complex ddata[6], *c, s = 3.0;
int i;
d=data;
c=ddata;
for (i = 0; i<6; i++) {
printf("c(%p), d(%p)=%f\n",c,d,*d);
*c++ = *d++ * s;
}
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-07 9:55 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " orion at cora dot nwra.com
@ 2011-07-07 9:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-07 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-07 09:54:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 24704
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24704
gcc47-pr49644.patch
Untested fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-05 20:02 ` orion at cora dot nwra.com
@ 2011-07-07 9:55 ` orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-07 9:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: orion at cora dot nwra.com @ 2011-07-07 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski <orion at cora dot nwra.com> 2011-07-07 09:54:59 UTC ---
I am on vacation and will be out of the office until Thursay, July 21st.
Your message has been saved and I will respond if needed when I return.
If this is an urgent CoRA computing issue, please send email to
coracomputer@cora.nwra.com.
Cheers,
Orion
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-07 9:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-07 19:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-07 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-07 19:11:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 19:11:27 2011
New Revision: 176004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176004
Log:
PR c/49644
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op): For MULT_EXPR and TRUNC_DIV_EXPR with
one non-complex and one complex argument, call c_save_expr on both
operands.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr49644.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr49644.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-typeck.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-07 19:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-07 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-07 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-07 19:14:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 19:14:38 2011
New Revision: 176005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176005
Log:
PR c/49644
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op): For MULT_EXPR and TRUNC_DIV_EXPR with
one non-complex and one complex argument, call c_save_expr on both
operands.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr49644.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr49644.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/c-typeck.c
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-07 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-07 19:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-07 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-07 19:19:52 UTC ---
Fixed for C in 4.6+ so far, C++ patch is waiting for review.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-07 19:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-07 19:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-07 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-07 19:41:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 19:41:55 2011
New Revision: 176006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176006
Log:
PR c/49644
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): For MULT_EXPR and TRUNC_DIV_EXPR with
one non-complex and one complex argument, call save_expr on both
operands.
* g++.dg/torture/pr49644.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr49644.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-07 19:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-07 19:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 13:08 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-07 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-07 19:43:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 19:42:58 2011
New Revision: 176007
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176007
Log:
PR c/49644
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): For MULT_EXPR and TRUNC_DIV_EXPR with
one non-complex and one complex argument, call save_expr on both
operands.
* g++.dg/torture/pr49644.C: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr49644.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/typeck.c
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-07 19:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-19 13:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 13:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-19 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-19 13:07:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 13:07:23 2011
New Revision: 176456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176456
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-07 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/49644
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op): For MULT_EXPR and TRUNC_DIV_EXPR with
one non-complex and one complex argument, call c_save_expr on both
operands.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr49644.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr49644.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/c-typeck.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-19 13:08 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-19 13:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 13:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-01 14:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-19 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-19 13:08:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 13:08:33 2011
New Revision: 176457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176457
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-07 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/49644
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): For MULT_EXPR and TRUNC_DIV_EXPR with
one non-complex and one complex argument, call save_expr on both
operands.
* g++.dg/torture/pr49644.C: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr49644.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/cp/typeck.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-19 13:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-19 13:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-01 14:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-19 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-19 13:48:36 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/49644] [4.5 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-19 13:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-01 14:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-01 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |michael.pippig at
| |mathematik dot
| |tu-chemnitz.de
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-01 14:50:17 UTC ---
*** Bug 49933 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-01 14:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-05 15:35 [Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-05 15:42 ` [Bug c/49644] [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted to complex " orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-05 15:42 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-05 19:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-05 20:02 ` orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-07 9:55 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " orion at cora dot nwra.com
2011-07-07 9:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-07 19:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 13:08 ` [Bug c/49644] [4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 13:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 13:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-01 14:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).