From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6829 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2011 15:21:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 6819 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2011 15:21:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:20:47 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/49651] [C++0x] nested lambdas and -O3 produced incorrect integer variable increments X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:21:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00920.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-12 15:19:48 UTC --- Shorter testcase that also terminates when successful: #include #include extern "C" void abort (void); typedef unsigned int u32; using namespace std; vector g; void f(u32 a, u32 b) { g.push_back(b); for(int i=1; i vi; vi.push_back(0); vi.push_back(1); vi.push_back(2); vi.push_back(3); vi.push_back(4); vector vo; vo.push_back(5); vo.push_back(5); vector ve; ve.push_back(5); vector v3; vector v4; vector v5; vector v6; vector v7; f(32, a++); f(32, a++); auto run = [&](int& i) { // inside this lambda &a is not the same as the &a in the first line v3.push_back(i); v4.push_back(i); v5.push_back(i); v6.push_back(i); v7.push_back(i); f(32, a++); v3.push_back(i); v4.push_back(i); v5.push_back(i); v6.push_back(i); v7.push_back(i); f(32, a++); for_each(ve.begin(), ve.end(), [&](int& xi) { v7.push_back(xi); f(32, a++); }); f(32, a++); }; f(32, a++); while(--cnt) { for_each(vi.begin(), vi.end(), [&](int& xi) { f(32, a++); for_each(vo.begin(), vo.end(), run); f(32, a++); for_each(ve.begin(), ve.end(), run); f(32, a++); }); } }