From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10232 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2011 08:42:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 10106 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2011 08:42:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:42:10 +0000 From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/49725] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: c34005a X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.2 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:42:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg01064.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-14 08:41:36 UTC --- I will have a look at it next week (if it can be reproduced on the hppa in the compile farm). Nevertheless, the interesting thing is that the patch only makes SRA to do less, never more. Does the ICE happen even if you switch SRA off completely with -fno-tree-sra ? Thanks.