* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 17:00 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-13 17:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-07-13 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-13 17:00:22 UTC ---
> # If the gcc directory specifies which extra parts to
> # build for this target, and the libgcc configuration also
> # specifies, make sure they match. This can be removed
> # when the gcc directory no longer holds libgcc configuration;
> # it is useful when migrating a target.
> Configuration mismatch!
> Extra parts from gcc directory: crtfastmath.o crtprec32.o crtprec64.o
> crtprec80.o
> Extra parts from libgcc: crt3.o
> exit 1
> make[5]: *** [libgcc-extra-parts] Error 1
> ...
This just occured to me when I was about to commit the i386/crtprec
patch. Testing for that one has completed successfully, but even if I
commit that one, the crtfastmath one is still pending.
I've just submitted the revised version, asking for approval so I can
commit both i386/crtprec and crtfastmath to gether to get us out of this
mess.
Sorry.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:00 ` [Bug bootstrap/49737] " ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-07-13 17:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 17:03:30 UTC ---
I configured the build with
../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java,lto --with-gmp=/opt/sw64
--with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/sw64 --with-system-zlib --with-cloog=/opt/sw64
--enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-lto
A nonparallel make gives
# If this is the top-level multilib, build all the other
# multilibs.
/bin/sh ../../../../work/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs ../../.././gcc/i386
for file in libgcc_s.1.dylib libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib libgcc_ext.10.5.dylib; do
\
rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/$file; \
ln -s ../$file ../../.././gcc/i386/; \
done
rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib
ln -s libgcc_s.1.dylib \
../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib
rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib <-- ppc64 seems
quite suspicious here
ln -s libgcc_s.1.dylib \
../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib
# If the gcc directory specifies which extra parts to
# build for this target, and the libgcc configuration also
# specifies, make sure they match. This can be removed
# when the gcc directory no longer holds libgcc configuration;
# it is useful when migrating a target.
Configuration mismatch!
Extra parts from gcc directory: crtfastmath.o crtprec32.o crtprec64.o
crtprec80.o
Extra parts from libgcc: crt3.o
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:00 ` [Bug bootstrap/49737] " ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-13 17:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 17:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-13 17:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-07-13 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-13 17:10:14 UTC ---
> rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib
> ln -s libgcc_s.1.dylib \
> ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib
> rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib <-- ppc64 seems
> quite suspicious here
> ln -s libgcc_s.1.dylib \
> ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib
This has nothing to do with the problem at hand. It's from
libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin (install-darwin-libgcc-stubs) where the
symlinks are created unconditionally, irrespective of target.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-13 17:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-07-13 17:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 17:28:11 UTC ---
With the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01068.html,
bootstrap fails with:
make[5]: *** No rule to make target
`../../../../work/libgcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c', needed by `crtfastmath.o'.
Stop.
at stage1 for -m32.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-13 17:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 17:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 17:39:51 UTC ---
> With the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01068.html,
> bootstrap fails with:
Apparently something went wrong in the patching process, trying revision
176241.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-13 17:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 17:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-13 18:12 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-07-13 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-13 17:43:32 UTC ---
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 17:39:51 UTC ---
>> With the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01068.html,
>> bootstrap fails with:
>
> Apparently something went wrong in the patching process, trying revision
> 176241.
You could probably say so: those are git-style patches containing
renames, and only git GNU patch can handle those, otherwise you have to
perform them manually.
That said, please update to rev 176242 instead. Unless I made a
mistake, that one should bootstrap again.
Sorry for the mess.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-13 17:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-07-13 18:12 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 18:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 18:11:57 UTC ---
> That said, please update to rev 176242 instead. Unless I made a
> mistake, that one should bootstrap again.
I am now at stage 2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-13 18:12 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 18:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-14 8:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-14 9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-07-13 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-13 18:20:48 UTC ---
> I am now at stage 2.
Great. Please close the PR one bootstrap finished.
Thanks.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-13 18:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-07-14 8:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-14 9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-14 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-14 08:00:48 UTC ---
Bootstrap finished, closing as fixed, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-14 8:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-14 9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-14 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread