public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
@ 2011-07-13 16:55 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-13 17:00 ` [Bug bootstrap/49737] " ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

           Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240
                    on x86_64-apple-darwin10
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: dominiq@lps.ens.fr
                CC: ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
              Host: x86_64-apple-darwin10
            Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10
             Build: x86_64-apple-darwin10


Bootstrap fail on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at revision 176240 with:

...
/opt/gcc/build_w/./gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/build_w/./gcc/
-B/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/bin/
-B/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/lib/ -isystem
/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/include -isystem
/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/sys-include    -g -O2 -O2  -g -O2
-DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include  -fPIC -pipe -g
-DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector   -I.
-I. -I../.././gcc -I../../../work/libgcc -I../../../work/libgcc/.
-I../../../work/libgcc/../gcc -I../../../work/libgcc/../include  -DHAVE_CC_TLS
-DUSE_EMUTLS -o _gcov_execve.o -MT _gcov_execve.o -MD -MP -MF _gcov_execve.dep
-DL_gcov_execve -c ../../../work/libgcc/libgcov.c
/usr/bin/ranlib: file: libgcc_eh.a(unwind-sjlj.o) has no symbols
ranlib libgcc_eh.a
ranlib: file: libgcc_eh.a(unwind-sjlj.o) has no symbols
# If the gcc directory specifies which extra parts to
# build for this target, and the libgcc configuration also
# specifies, make sure they match.  This can be removed
# when the gcc directory no longer holds libgcc configuration;
# it is useful when migrating a target.
Configuration mismatch!
Extra parts from gcc directory: crtfastmath.o crtprec32.o crtprec64.o
crtprec80.o
Extra parts from libgcc: crt3.o
exit 1
make[5]: *** [libgcc-extra-parts] Error 1
...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 17:00 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2011-07-13 17:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-07-13 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-13 17:00:22 UTC ---
> # If the gcc directory specifies which extra parts to
> # build for this target, and the libgcc configuration also
> # specifies, make sure they match.  This can be removed
> # when the gcc directory no longer holds libgcc configuration;
> # it is useful when migrating a target.
> Configuration mismatch!
> Extra parts from gcc directory: crtfastmath.o crtprec32.o crtprec64.o
> crtprec80.o
> Extra parts from libgcc: crt3.o
> exit 1
> make[5]: *** [libgcc-extra-parts] Error 1
> ...

This just occured to me when I was about to commit the i386/crtprec
patch.  Testing for that one has completed successfully, but even if I
commit that one, the crtfastmath one is still pending.

I've just submitted the revised version, asking for approval so I can
commit both i386/crtprec and crtfastmath to gether to get us out of this
mess.

Sorry.
        Rainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-13 17:00 ` [Bug bootstrap/49737] " ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-07-13 17:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-13 17:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 17:03:30 UTC ---
I configured the build with

../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java,lto --with-gmp=/opt/sw64
--with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/sw64 --with-system-zlib --with-cloog=/opt/sw64
--enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-lto

A nonparallel make gives


# If this is the top-level multilib, build all the other
# multilibs.
/bin/sh ../../../../work/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs ../../.././gcc/i386
for file in libgcc_s.1.dylib  libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib libgcc_ext.10.5.dylib; do  
         \
      rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/$file;        \
      ln -s ../$file ../../.././gcc/i386/;    \
    done
rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib
ln -s libgcc_s.1.dylib \
        ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib
rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib                <-- ppc64 seems
quite suspicious here
ln -s libgcc_s.1.dylib \
        ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib
# If the gcc directory specifies which extra parts to
# build for this target, and the libgcc configuration also
# specifies, make sure they match.  This can be removed
# when the gcc directory no longer holds libgcc configuration;
# it is useful when migrating a target.
Configuration mismatch!
Extra parts from gcc directory: crtfastmath.o crtprec32.o crtprec64.o
crtprec80.o
Extra parts from libgcc: crt3.o


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-13 17:00 ` [Bug bootstrap/49737] " ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2011-07-13 17:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 17:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2011-07-13 17:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-07-13 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-13 17:10:14 UTC ---
> rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib
> ln -s libgcc_s.1.dylib \
>         ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib
> rm -f ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib                <-- ppc64 seems
> quite suspicious here
> ln -s libgcc_s.1.dylib \
>         ../../.././gcc/i386/libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib

This has nothing to do with the problem at hand.  It's from
libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin (install-darwin-libgcc-stubs) where the
symlinks are created unconditionally, irrespective of target.

    Rainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-13 17:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-07-13 17:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-13 17:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 17:28:11 UTC ---
With the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01068.html,
bootstrap fails with:

make[5]: *** No rule to make target
`../../../../work/libgcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c', needed by `crtfastmath.o'.
 Stop.

at stage1 for -m32.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-13 17:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 17:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-13 17:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 17:39:51 UTC ---
> With the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01068.html,
> bootstrap fails with:

Apparently something went wrong in the patching process, trying revision
176241.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-13 17:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 17:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2011-07-13 18:12 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-07-13 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-13 17:43:32 UTC ---
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 17:39:51 UTC ---
>> With the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01068.html,
>> bootstrap fails with:
>
> Apparently something went wrong in the patching process, trying revision
> 176241.

You could probably say so: those are git-style patches containing
renames, and only git GNU patch can handle those, otherwise you have to
perform them manually.

That said, please update to rev 176242 instead.  Unless I made a
mistake, that one should bootstrap again.

Sorry for the mess.

    Rainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-13 17:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-07-13 18:12 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-13 18:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-13 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-13 18:11:57 UTC ---
> That said, please update to rev 176242 instead.  Unless I made a
> mistake, that one should bootstrap again.

I am now at stage 2.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-13 18:12 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-13 18:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2011-07-14  8:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-14  9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-07-13 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-13 18:20:48 UTC ---
> I am now at stage 2.

Great.  Please close the PR one bootstrap finished.

Thanks.
        Rainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-13 18:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-07-14  8:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-07-14  9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-07-14  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-07-14 08:00:48 UTC ---
Bootstrap finished, closing as fixed, thanks.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/49737] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10
  2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-14  8:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-07-14  9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-14  9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.7.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-14  9:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-13 16:55 [Bug bootstrap/49737] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 176240 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:00 ` [Bug bootstrap/49737] " ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-13 17:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-13 17:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 17:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-13 18:12 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-13 18:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-07-14  8:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-07-14  9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).