From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-376289-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29102 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2011 08:59:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 29092 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2011 08:59:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:59:20 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/49772] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in ipa_pta_execute, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:6790 with -fipa-pta
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-49772-4-tK8Wd89ygv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00855.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772

--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-12-08 08:57:22 UTC ---
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
> 
> --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-08 04:54:41 UTC ---
> A better non specific to tree-ssa-structaliasing patch:
> Index: cgraphunit.c
> ===================================================================
> --- cgraphunit.c        (revision 182098)
> +++ cgraphunit.c        (working copy)
> @@ -1817,6 +1817,9 @@ cgraph_expand_function (struct cgraph_no
>    /* Generate RTL for the body of DECL.  */
>    tree_rest_of_compilation (decl);
> 
> +  if (seen_error ())
> +    return;
> +
>    /* Make sure that BE didn't give up on compiling.  */
>    gcc_assert (TREE_ASM_WRITTEN (decl));
>    current_function_decl = NULL;
> Index: passes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- passes.c    (revision 182098)
> +++ passes.c    (working copy)
> @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ execute_one_pass (struct opt_pass *pass)
>      timevar_push (pass->tv_id);
> 
>    /* Do it!  */
> -  if (pass->execute)
> +  if (pass->execute && !seen_error ())
>      {
>        todo_after = pass->execute ();
>        do_per_function (clear_last_verified, NULL);

We don't want late warnings in random functions to be suppressed
by earlier errors.