From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5395 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2011 21:23:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 5385 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2011 21:23:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_SG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:23:04 +0000 From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/49791] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Formatted namelist reads fails with: Cannot match namelist object X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.4.7 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:23:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg01702.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl 2011-07-20 21:22:36 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #3) >> If the bug reporter can, I think he should convert all the input >> files to the Fortran 90 syntax of namelists. However, one needs >> to be careful to not inadvertently to change the meaning (e.g. >> remove the wrong "(1)") and it might >> affect many files. >> > > I can change the test suite, but since we also use the Intel and > PGI compilers, I wouldn't be able to guarantee other people won't > get confused with this. Confused by using standard conforming syntax? Perhaps, people should not use features of a language if they do not understand those features.