public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-49813-4-uUbGj2t3F1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-49813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #32 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-07-25 10:59:30 UTC ---
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
>
> --- Comment #31 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-07-25 10:54:24 UTC ---
> Richard, as far as I can see, if we don't fold, we don't fold, that line of
> user code with, eg constexpr data, will simply not compile. I don't think this
> is a major issue...
Ah, ok. So a constexpr function only means the frontend has to "try"
to constant-fold it, and if it doesn't fold to a constant it's an
errorneous program. I suppose only if the result is used in a
constexpr, that is (recursively so).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 10:33 [Bug c++/49813] New: " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 10:40 ` [Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-22 10:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-22 10:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-22 10:51 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 10:53 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 10:58 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-22 11:02 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 11:08 ` vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-07-22 11:10 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 11:19 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-22 11:23 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 11:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-22 11:25 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 11:30 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-22 11:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-22 11:41 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 11:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-22 12:32 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 14:43 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-22 15:08 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 15:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-22 16:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-22 16:49 ` vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-07-22 17:17 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-24 14:56 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-07-25 5:12 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 10:20 ` [Bug libstdc++/49813] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 10:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 10:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 10:51 ` [Bug c++/49813] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 10:55 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 11:00 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2011-07-25 11:02 ` vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-07-25 11:18 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 11:43 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 11:46 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-25 11:46 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 11:47 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 11:50 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 11:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-25 19:59 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-26 0:12 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-26 0:27 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-26 0:29 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-27 16:51 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-27 17:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-27 19:34 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-27 22:33 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-27 22:56 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-07-27 23:15 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-28 6:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-28 9:28 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-28 21:01 ` sje at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-01 18:16 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-01 18:28 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-01 19:27 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-11 17:34 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-09-21 1:21 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2014-12-31 15:00 ` yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot com
2020-03-11 16:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-11 16:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-49813-4-uUbGj2t3F1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).