public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
@ 2011-07-24 3:20 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-07-24 21:32 ` [Bug target/49826] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (21 more replies)
0 siblings, 22 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2011-07-24 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with
attribute stdcall and -mrtd
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: d.g.gorbachev@gmail.com
Target: i686-pc-mingw32
Code:
extern void __attribute__((stdcall)) bar(int);
void foo(void)
{
bar(0);
}
When compiled with gcc-4.6 -mrtd
call _bar@4
With gcc-4.7 -mrtd
call _bar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2011-07-24 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-14 20:02 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (20 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-24 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-07-24 21:32 ` [Bug target/49826] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-14 20:02 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-10-10 12:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2011-09-14 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2011-09-14 19:35:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 25274
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25274
patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-07-24 21:32 ` [Bug target/49826] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-14 20:02 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2011-10-10 12:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-11 20:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-10 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-10 11:59:41 UTC ---
Patches should be posted to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org with a ChangeLog entry
and a note how it was tested.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-10-10 12:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-10-11 20:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-30 17:59 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-11 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-10-11 20:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-12-30 17:59 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-01 15:34 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-12-30 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-30 17:42:56 UTC ---
Hmm, I am not that sure, if this is at all a bug, as linker can handle
undecorated stdcall-s quite well as import.
I am more curious for what purpose you actual need the @<n> decoration in
combination with -mrtd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-12-30 17:59 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-01 15:34 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-03-22 8:41 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2012-01-01 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2012-01-01 15:33:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The linker does not work very well with undecorated stdcall-s. For example:
<http://sourceware.org/PR13495>. But if that bug will be fixed, then this one
can be closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-01 15:34 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2012-03-22 8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14 8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-22 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-22 08:26:05 UTC ---
GCC 4.7.0 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-22 8:41 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-14 8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-20 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-14 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-14 08:10:32 UTC ---
GCC 4.7.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-14 8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-09-20 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 17:54 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-20 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.2 |4.7.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-20 10:12:54 UTC ---
GCC 4.7.2 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-09-20 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-15 17:54 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 23:48 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-15 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P4
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-15 17:54:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
>
> The linker does not work very well with undecorated stdcall-s. For example:
> <http://sourceware.org/PR13495>. But if that bug will be fixed, then this one
> can be closed.
Hmm, can't reproduce what your issue is here actual. Nevertheless seems to me
that patch plain wrong. For -mrtd the default-calling convention is stdcall,
so to mark a symbol explicit with an stdcall-attribute is somewhat a
nop-expression.
I understand that you would like to have an extension that gcc is able to use
for user-attributed stdcall functions instead the @<n> decoration.
The suggested patch looks wrong, as it doesn't check if symbol has
user-attribute on symbol. Nevertheless this bug is IMHO an extension and not a
bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-15 17:54 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-15 23:48 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-04-11 7:59 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-15 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2013-01-15 23:47:58 UTC ---
> Hmm, can't reproduce what your issue is here actual.
The issue is that --enable-stdcall-fixup only works with plain object files and
does not work when a symbol is in a static library.
> For -mrtd the default-calling convention is stdcall,
> so to mark a symbol explicit with an stdcall-attribute
> is somewhat a nop-expression.
I want stdcall functions to have the @<n> decoration regardless of the
stdcall-attribute, i.e. pre-GCC-4.7.0 behavior.
> Nevertheless this bug is IMHO an extension and not a bug.
Well, then I ask to add another option (perhaps called -mold-rtd or
-mrtd-decorate or -mstdcall or something like that).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-15 23:48 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2013-04-11 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:45 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-11 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.7.4
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-11 07:58:49 UTC ---
GCC 4.7.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2013-04-11 7:59 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-12 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:30 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-12 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The 4.7 branch is being closed, moving target milestone to 4.8.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-12 13:45 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:22 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-19 13:30 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-23 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 19:58 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-23 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |4.9.3
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gcc-4_8-branch is being closed, re-targeting regressions to 4.9.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-23 8:22 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 19:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 19:58 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:46 ` [Bug target/49826] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 9:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:46 ` [Bug target/49826] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:34 ` [Bug target/49826] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:29 ` [Bug target/49826] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:34 ` [Bug target/49826] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:29 ` [Bug target/49826] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/49826] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-24 3:20 [Bug target/49826] New: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-07-24 21:32 ` [Bug target/49826] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-14 20:02 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-10-10 12:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-11 20:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-30 17:59 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-01 15:34 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-03-22 8:41 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14 8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-20 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 17:54 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 23:48 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-04-11 7:59 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:45 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:30 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:22 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 19:58 ` [Bug target/49826] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:46 ` [Bug target/49826] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:34 ` [Bug target/49826] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:29 ` [Bug target/49826] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).