public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O
@ 2011-07-25 15:37 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 4:54 ` [Bug libmudflap/49843] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-25 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843
Summary: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libmudflap
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org
CC: fche@redhat.com
Host: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], sparc-sun-solaris2*,
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], sparc-sun-solaris2*,
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], sparc-sun-solaris2*,
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
It seems that there's only one libmudflap test failing on most targets:
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test
It only fails for 64-bit multilibs and only at -O, -O[023] does work.
I wonder what to do about that. I do have a patch to XFAIL the test, but
strangely it turns the FAIL into a PASS, not XFAIL.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/49843] 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O
2011-07-25 15:37 [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-14 4:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-17 11:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-10 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-14 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-14
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 03:18:46 UTC ---
It also fails on mips64-linux-gnu with both N32 and N64.
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/49843] 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O
2011-07-25 15:37 [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 4:54 ` [Bug libmudflap/49843] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-17 11:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-10 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-17 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-17 11:39:46 UTC ---
Starting with my commit
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=186501
it's probably going to fail at all optimization levels (IIRC the
compilation reported as -O0 is actually with -O2). I am aware of that
but the patch has passed review and the generated IL looks perfectly
OK and given that the problem was apparently present before I commited
the patch, I thought it appropriate that someone familiar with mudflap
would have a look at the issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/49843] 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O
2011-07-25 15:37 [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 4:54 ` [Bug libmudflap/49843] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-17 11:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-11-10 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-11-10 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fmudflap support has been removed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-10 5:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-25 15:37 [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 4:54 ` [Bug libmudflap/49843] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-17 11:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-10 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).