public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O
@ 2011-07-25 15:37 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 4:54 ` [Bug libmudflap/49843] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-25 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843
Summary: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libmudflap
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org
CC: fche@redhat.com
Host: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], sparc-sun-solaris2*,
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], sparc-sun-solaris2*,
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], sparc-sun-solaris2*,
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
It seems that there's only one libmudflap test failing on most targets:
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test
It only fails for 64-bit multilibs and only at -O, -O[023] does work.
I wonder what to do about that. I do have a patch to XFAIL the test, but
strangely it turns the FAIL into a PASS, not XFAIL.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug libmudflap/49843] 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O 2011-07-25 15:37 [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-14 4:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17 11:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-10 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-14 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-14 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 03:18:46 UTC --- It also fails on mips64-linux-gnu with both N32 and N64. Confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/49843] 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O 2011-07-25 15:37 [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-14 4:54 ` [Bug libmudflap/49843] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-17 11:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-10 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-17 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843 Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-17 11:39:46 UTC --- Starting with my commit http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=186501 it's probably going to fail at all optimization levels (IIRC the compilation reported as -O0 is actually with -O2). I am aware of that but the patch has passed review and the generated IL looks perfectly OK and given that the problem was apparently present before I commited the patch, I thought it appropriate that someone familiar with mudflap would have a look at the issue. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/49843] 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O 2011-07-25 15:37 [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-14 4:54 ` [Bug libmudflap/49843] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17 11:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-11-10 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-11-10 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- fmudflap support has been removed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-10 5:53 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-07-25 15:37 [Bug libmudflap/49843] New: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-14 4:54 ` [Bug libmudflap/49843] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17 11:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-10 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).