public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 == NULL)
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-49847-4-KIiBQ68bBM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-49847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #28 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #24)
> One could argue that the CFG building code could be tweaked so that a
> cc0-setter is never considered the end of a block.
The CFG is built too early (on gimple) to know what may end up a cc0
setter. It'd take more than a few CFG fixup hacks after expanding to
RTL to get the cc0-setter and cc0-consumer back together in the same
basic block.
How did this work (i.e. what did the CFG look like) before tree-ssa,
e.g. in gcc 3.4?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-15 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-25 21:07 [Bug java/49847] New: m68k gcj-4.6 " tg at mirbsd dot org
2011-09-03 19:32 ` [Bug java/49847] " tg at mirbsd dot org
2011-12-12 10:02 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2011-12-15 21:01 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.6/4.7 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-16 9:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-20 22:07 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-01-21 16:13 ` tg at mirbsd dot org
2012-01-22 2:16 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-01-22 10:33 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-01-22 12:29 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-01-22 13:02 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-01-22 13:39 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-01-22 14:36 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-01-23 13:41 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-01-23 16:37 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.7 Regression] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-01-23 20:22 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-02-05 21:57 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-02-07 15:50 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-02-26 22:37 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-02-29 19:19 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-03-22 8:43 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-20 10:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-11 8:00 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-19 13:26 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-07-29 20:57 ` tg at mirbsd dot org
2014-02-07 22:58 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-02-14 18:39 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-02-15 13:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-02-15 14:22 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-15 18:59 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2014-02-16 13:17 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-02-17 10:01 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2014-02-25 6:14 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-02-25 8:41 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2014-02-27 19:03 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:43 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 22:35 ` law at redhat dot com
2015-01-20 8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-49847-4-KIiBQ68bBM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).