From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3424 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2011 11:47:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 3416 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2011 11:47:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_ZJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:47:22 +0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/49866] [4.6 Regression] -mcmodel=large tail call fails to assemble X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.2 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:47:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg02332.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49866 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-27 11:46:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > This got fixed on the trunk with > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173797 > but for the backport it would be certainly preferrable if we got a smaller and > less riskier fix than that. The change you are referring to is fairly mechanical, so I see no problem to backport it entirely. But the backport should be handled with care, of course.