From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23116 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2011 10:57:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 23108 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jul 2011 10:57:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:57:20 +0000 From: "fabian.bergmark at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/49921] [C++0x] Segfault during compilation, decltype and operator->* X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fabian.bergmark at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg02676.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D49921 --- Comment #2 from fabian.bergmark at gmail dot com 2011-07-31 10:57:17 UT= C --- (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed. Mainline says: >=20 > 49921.C: In function =E2=80=98int main()=E2=80=99: > 49921.C:15:25: internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type = or > union_type or qual_union_type, have translation_unit_decl in > maybe_dummy_object, at cp/tree.c:2474 To quote Modern C++ Design by Andrei Alexandrescu: "In C++, where every object has a type, the result of operator->* or operat= or.* is a unique exception." and "Both are binary functions all right, and they return something to which you can apply the function-call operator immediately, but that "something" does= no have a type." Is this possibly the reason to the error?