From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22610 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2011 20:30:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 22448 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2011 20:30:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:29:47 +0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/49962] [OOP] ICE when using type-bound function returning vector X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:30:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00580.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 20:28:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I think it would make many people's life easier if this fix could be > back ported to 4.5, considering the fact that most clusters for > engineering computation tend to use old compilers. Ok, the patch is simple enough after all. If I get approval by another Fortran maintainer, I'll be happy to do the backport. The original fix of r160622 was committed by Paul. So: Paul, Tobias, what do you think? Ok to backport to 4.5?