From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8612 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2011 17:59:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 8603 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2011 17:59:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:58:57 +0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/49962] [OOP] ICE when using type-bound function returning vector X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Summary Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:59:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00555.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|"internal compiler error" |[OOP] ICE when using |when using type-bounded |type-bound function |function returning vector |returning vector --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 17:58:55 UTC --- This is certainly a duplicate of PR49961, and has been fixed by r160622, which could also be backported to the 4.5 branch. Since we got two apparently independent bug reports for this on the same day: Is there any "real-world" code which is affected by this bug? Or in other words: How did you come across this bug?