* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-04 18:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 19:05 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-04 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|sh4-unknown-linux-gnu, |sh4-unknown-linux-gnu,
|cris-elf |cris-elf,
| |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.08.04 18:20:05
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-04 18:20:05 UTC ---
On hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, I'm seeing the the following g++ eh fails with revision
177282:
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/unexpected1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/crossjump1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/forced1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/uncaught1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/unexpected1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/cxa_vec.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/fntry1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow5.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow6.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh23.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh39.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh40.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb31.C execution test
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 18:20 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] " danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-04 19:05 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 19:50 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-04 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rth at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-04 19:05:11 UTC ---
Mine.
Kaz, can you enumerate some specific tests that are now failing?
It'll save me time trying to track down the problem. E.g. a cross
to CRIS is hanging in the simulator for *every* execution test,
so I assume there's something wrong with my cris-sim dejagnu setup.
I havn't tried sh-sim yet, but will do so while looking at hppa...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 18:20 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] " danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 19:05 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-04 19:50 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 20:29 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-04 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-04 19:50:03 UTC ---
David, most of those c++ tests require system headers to compile,
but g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb31.C does not.
Except that I don't see any changes to unwind info in any delay
slots for that test case, so I'm particularly confused about what
could have gone wrong with that test. Does it work without delayed
branches?
Or is the problem in fact in libgcc somewhere? I.e. you have to
compile libgcc with -fno-delayed-branch in order to fix things?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-04 19:50 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-04 20:29 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2011-08-04 21:19 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2011-08-04 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-08-04 20:28:54 UTC ---
On 4-Aug-11, at 3:50 PM, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
>
> Or is the problem in fact in libgcc somewhere? I.e. you have to
> compile libgcc with -fno-delayed-branch in order to fix things?
The problem looks to be in libgcc:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xc000000000091924 in _Unwind_DeleteException (exc=0x800000010000a090)
at ../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/unwind.inc:271
271 (*exc->exception_cleanup) (_URC_FOREIGN_EXCEPTION_CAUGHT, exc);
(gdb) p exc
$1 = (struct _Unwind_Exception *) 0x800000010000a090
(gdb) p exc->exception_cleanup
$2 = (_Unwind_Exception_Cleanup_Fn) 0x100000001
(gdb) p/x *exc
$4 = {exception_class = 0x474e5543432b2b00, exception_cleanup =
0x100000001,
private_1 = 0x0, private_2 = 0x800003fffdff0940}
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-04 20:29 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2011-08-04 21:19 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 21:52 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-04 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-04 21:18:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Kaz, can you enumerate some specific tests that are now failing?
I've got
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-10.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-11.c execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/crossjump1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/unexpected1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/cleanup-10.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/cleanup-11.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr49115.C -O1 execution test
...
A tiny testcase in #1 of PR49686
int foo (int a)
{
if (a)
bar ();
return 1;
}
is again compiled to
foo:
.LFB0:
tst r4,r4
bt/s .L2
sts.l pr,@-r15
mov.l .L3,r0
jsr @r0
nop
with -O1 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-04 21:19 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-04 21:52 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-05 2:29 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-04 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-04 21:51:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> E.g. a cross
> to CRIS is hanging in the simulator for *every* execution test,
> so I assume there's something wrong with my cris-sim dejagnu setup.
Likely. Sounds like the usual ungraceful failure of dejagnu to find the
baseboard file: it just tries to execute the file natively and then oddly times
out instead of just failing; note lack of "cris-axis-elf-run" calls in the
<whatever>.log files. That is, if you're running dejagnu-1.4.4 or earlier;
dejagnu-1.5 should already have the baseboard. For future reference,
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20204#c7>.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-04 21:52 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-05 2:29 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-05 16:17 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-05 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-05 02:29:40 UTC ---
Proposed patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00551.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-05 2:29 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-05 16:17 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-05 16:18 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-05 16:17:20 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 5 16:17:13 2011
New Revision: 177465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177465
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49977
* dwarf2cfi.c (scan_insn_after): Split out of ...
(scan_trace): ... here. Correctly place notes wrt sequences.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-05 16:17 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-05 16:18 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-05 16:19 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-10 2:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-05 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-05 16:17:54 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 5 16:17:46 2011
New Revision: 177466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177466
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49977
* dwarf2cfi.c (scan_insn_after): Split out of ...
(scan_trace): ... here. Correctly place notes wrt sequences.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-05 16:18 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-05 16:19 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-10 2:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-05 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-05 16:18:57 UTC ---
Fixed? Dave, if this works for you on pa, please close.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot
2011-08-04 14:01 [Bug rtl-optimization/49977] New: [4.7 Regression] CFI notes are missed for delayed slot kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-05 16:19 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-10 2:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-10 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-10 02:41:57 UTC ---
Now the testresult for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 looks good
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-08/msg00952.html
I'd like to close this PR.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread