public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gary at intrepid dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/50010] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:57:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-50010-4-MyWjjhnDRR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-50010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 --- Comment #4 from Gary Funck <gary at intrepid dot com> 2011-08-20 17:03:58 UTC --- We ran a reghunt of sorts and came up with the following results. The first confirmed bootstrap comparison failure occurred after revision 177265 was applied. r177265 | uros | 2011-08-03 03:46:04 -0700 (Wed, 03 Aug 2011) | 9 lines However, the builds before that revision terminated with a compilation error in config/linux/affinity.c, which was fixed by this revision. The compilation error was introduced by this commit: r177194 | jakub | 2011-08-02 09:13:29 -0700 (Tue, 02 Aug 2011) | 238 lines Merge from gomp-3_1-branch branch: Thus, it seems that revision 177194 or a subsequent revision preceding 177265 introduced the bootstrap comparison failure on i386 (we ran our tests on i686 running CentOS).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-20 17:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-08-07 8:45 [Bug bootstrap/50010] New: " gerald at pfeifer dot com 2011-08-12 0:12 ` [Bug bootstrap/50010] " nenad at intrepid dot com 2011-08-12 6:58 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-08-12 22:55 ` nenad at intrepid dot com 2011-08-20 17:57 ` gary at intrepid dot com [this message] 2011-08-20 19:05 ` [Bug bootstrap/50010] [4.7 regression] " gerald at pfeifer dot com 2011-08-20 19:45 ` gary at intrepid dot com 2011-08-20 21:05 ` gary at intrepid dot com 2011-08-20 23:13 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com 2011-08-20 23:18 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-08-21 9:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-11 3:40 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com 2011-09-11 10:44 ` [Bug bootstrap/50010] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure without CFI directives ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-11 16:33 ` gary at intrepid dot com 2011-09-11 19:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-12 8:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-12 12:52 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com 2011-09-12 18:54 ` gary at intrepid dot com 2011-09-12 19:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-12 20:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-13 15:25 ` gfunck at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-50010-4-MyWjjhnDRR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).