public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "danny.dyk@tu-dortmund.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/50015] New: std::initializer_list<std::string> members are not properly initialized Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 15:48:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-50015-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50015 Summary: std::initializer_list<std::string> members are not properly initialized Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: danny.dyk@tu-dortmund.de Created attachment 24940 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24940 Output of 'g++ -std=c++0x -save-temps -o test-case test-case.cc' When creating a std::initializer_list<std::string> as part of a struct, the actual object is not properly initialized. Consider the following test case: -- BEGIN -- #include <initializer_list> #include <iostream> #include <string> struct T { std::initializer_list<std::string> s; }; T foo { {"foo", "bar", "baz"} }; int main(int, char**) { for (auto t = foo.s.begin(), t_end = foo.s.end() ; t != t_end ; ++t) std::cout << *t << std::endl; return 0; } -- END -- After compiling this test case using g++ -Wall -pedantic -std=c++0x -o test-case test-case.cc [no errors, no warnings] the execution of the resulting binary via ./test-case either raises a segmentation fault or produces garbled output, e.g., foo1`particularÿÿÿÿbar1ÿÿ Looks very much like terminating '\0's are not in place. This bug was first seen when using gcc-4.4.5 and is reproducable under gcc-4.5.0 up to gcc-4.6.1. The particular version of gcc-4.6.1 was configured as configure \ --prefix=/het/packages/gcc-${VERSION} \ --program-prefix=het- \ --program-suffix=-${VERSION} \ --enable-languages=c,c++ \ --disable-multilib and built on an amd64 system. I will attach the output of g++ -std=c++0x -save-temps -o test-case test-case.cc g++ -std=c++0x -fdump-tree-gimple -o test-case test-case.cc to this bug report. Thank you to Alexander Faeroey for help in reducing the segfaulting code to a manageable test case.
next reply other threads:[~2011-08-07 15:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-08-07 15:48 danny.dyk@tu-dortmund.de [this message] 2011-08-07 15:50 ` [Bug c++/50015] " danny.dyk@tu-dortmund.de 2011-08-07 16:38 ` [Bug c++/50015] [C++0x] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-08 13:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 16:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-50015-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).