From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7248 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2014 21:00:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7205 invoked by uid 48); 1 Mar 2014 21:00:51 -0000 From: "emsr at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/50025] [DR 1288] C++0x initialization syntax doesn't work for class members of reference type Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 21:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: emsr at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #18 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32240 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32240&action=edit This is a test case for c++/50025. This just has simple classes with various reference member and verifies that using brace-initialization is accepted. I put it under g++.dg/cpp0x. Would anyone like more test cases? If this passes on x86_64-linux I think I'll close this with the test case patch. OK?