public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123
@ 2011-08-11 9:23 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-02-21 11:55 ` [Bug c++/50043] " mimomorin at gmail dot com
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-08-11 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Bug #: 50043
Summary: [C++0x] Implement core/1123
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: paolo.carlini@oracle.com
... let's try this new Bugzilla ;)
This is an internal reminder that it would be nice to have implemented quite
soon the resolution of core/1123:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1123
For sure the library would immediately benefit, no more explicitly noexcept
destructors in a lot of places.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-02-21 11:55 ` mimomorin at gmail dot com
2012-02-21 12:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mimomorin at gmail dot com @ 2012-02-21 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #1 from Michel Morin <mimomorin at gmail dot com> 2012-02-21 11:51:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26711
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26711
A testcase for N3204
Attached a testcase for N3204 ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-02-21 11:55 ` [Bug c++/50043] " mimomorin at gmail dot com
@ 2012-02-21 12:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 2:48 ` mimomorin at gmail dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-21 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-21 12:05:40 UTC ---
We don't want front-end testcases that rely on <iostream> and need to check
what gets printed. A better test would use static_assert, but would also test
cases with both throwing and non-throwing base class and members.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-02-21 11:55 ` [Bug c++/50043] " mimomorin at gmail dot com
2012-02-21 12:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-22 2:48 ` mimomorin at gmail dot com
2012-03-23 1:07 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mimomorin at gmail dot com @ 2012-02-22 2:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #3 from Michel Morin <mimomorin at gmail dot com> 2012-02-22 02:43:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 26721
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26721
A updated testcase
OK, here is a take two!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-22 2:48 ` mimomorin at gmail dot com
@ 2012-03-23 1:07 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-23 1:35 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-03-23 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-03-23 01:05:26 UTC ---
Jason, I'm glad to work on this (if you don't have anything better to do ;) Any
tips for me? Shouldn't be so hard but I'm still a bit lost...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-23 1:07 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-03-23 1:35 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-23 18:03 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-03-23 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-03-23 01:07:00 UTC ---
Of course I meant "if you have something better to do ;)"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-23 1:35 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-03-23 18:03 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-23 18:45 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-03-23 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-03-23
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-03-23 17:59:05 UTC ---
I'm making some progress understanding these parts of the front-end.
For example the following trivial patchlet passes the testcase ;) But,
seriously, I'm not sure whether we really need a full fledged
build_exception_variant, whether we have to do something about LAZY_* things,
and much, much, more.
Index: class.c
===================================================================
--- class.c (revision 185722)
+++ class.c (working copy)
@@ -1001,6 +1001,10 @@ add_method (tree type, tree method, tree using_dec
"destructor",
type);
}
+ else if (cxx_dialect >= cxx0x
+ && !TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (method)))
+ TREE_TYPE (method) = build_exception_variant (TREE_TYPE (method),
+ noexcept_true_spec);
}
else
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-23 18:03 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-03-23 18:45 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-23 23:01 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-03-23 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-03-23 18:17:56 UTC ---
This doesn't compile, for example:
struct B
{
~B();
};
B::~B() { }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-23 18:45 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-03-23 23:01 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-28 10:06 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-03-23 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
|gnu.org |com
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-03-23 22:48:59 UTC ---
The latter issue could be addressed by something like:
Index: decl.c
===================================================================
--- decl.c (revision 185715)
+++ decl.c (working copy)
@@ -1136,7 +1136,10 @@ check_redeclaration_exception_specification (tree
if ((pedantic || ! DECL_IN_SYSTEM_HEADER (old_decl))
&& ! DECL_IS_BUILTIN (old_decl)
&& flag_exceptions
- && !comp_except_specs (new_exceptions, old_exceptions, ce_normal))
+ && !comp_except_specs (new_exceptions, old_exceptions, ce_normal)
+ && !(DECL_DESTRUCTOR_P (new_decl)
+ && cxx_dialect >= cxx0x
+ && !new_exceptions && TYPE_NOEXCEPT_P (old_type)))
{
error ("declaration of %qF has a different exception specifier",
new_decl);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-23 23:01 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-03-28 10:06 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-04-02 0:14 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-03-28 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|enhancement |normal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-28 10:06 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-04-02 0:14 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 0:20 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-02 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-02 00:13:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Apr 2 00:13:30 2012
New Revision: 186058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186058
Log:
/cp
2012-04-01 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/50043
* class.c (deduce_noexcept_on_destructor,
deduce_noexcept_on_destructors): New.
(check_bases_and_members): Call the latter.
* decl.c (grokfndecl): Call the former.
* method.c (implicitly_declare_fn): Not static.
* cp-tree.h (deduce_noexcept_on_destructor, implicitly_declare_fn):
Declare
/testsuite
2012-04-01 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/50043
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept17.C: New.
* g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C: Adjust.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept01.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/eh/init-temp1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/eh/ctor1.C: Likwise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept17.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/class.c
trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
trunk/gcc/cp/method.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept01.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/ctor1.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/init-temp1.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-02 0:14 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-02 0:20 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-04-12 0:11 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-04-02 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-04-02 00:19:43 UTC ---
Done. Library clean-ups will follow.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-02 0:20 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-04-12 0:11 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-11 10:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-04-12 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.kruegler at
| |googlemail dot com
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-04-12 00:10:26 UTC ---
*** Bug 51295 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-12 0:11 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-06-11 10:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-13 3:48 ` kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 10:28:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-11 10:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-13 3:48 ` kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
2012-06-15 2:15 ` kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
2014-05-05 15:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com @ 2012-06-13 3:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #13 from Kirby Zhou <kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com> 2012-06-13 03:48:34 UTC ---
How about back port this patch to 4.7 branch?
It cause a lot of compile error which easily confuse programmers.
(In reply to comment #9)
> Author: paolo
> Date: Mon Apr 2 00:13:30 2012
> New Revision: 186058
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186058
> Log:
> /cp
> 2012-04-01 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
>
> PR c++/50043
> * class.c (deduce_noexcept_on_destructor,
> deduce_noexcept_on_destructors): New.
> (check_bases_and_members): Call the latter.
> * decl.c (grokfndecl): Call the former.
> * method.c (implicitly_declare_fn): Not static.
> * cp-tree.h (deduce_noexcept_on_destructor, implicitly_declare_fn):
> Declare
>
> /testsuite
> 2012-04-01 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
>
> PR c++/50043
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept17.C: New.
> * g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C: Adjust.
> * g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C: Likewise.
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept01.C: Likewise.
> * g++.dg/eh/init-temp1.C: Likewise.
> * g++.dg/eh/ctor1.C: Likwise.
>
> Added:
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept17.C
> Modified:
> trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> trunk/gcc/cp/class.c
> trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
> trunk/gcc/cp/method.c
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept01.C
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/ctor1.C
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/init-temp1.C
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-13 3:48 ` kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
@ 2012-06-15 2:15 ` kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
2014-05-05 15:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com @ 2012-06-15 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #14 from Kirby Zhou <kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com> 2012-06-15 02:14:48 UTC ---
I have tested to apply this patch to 4.7 branch, everythings goes well.
Since it breaks already existing code, anybody can do commit backport to 4.7
branch?
(In reply to comment #13)
> How about back port this patch to 4.7 branch?
> It cause a lot of compile error which easily confuse programmers.
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Author: paolo
> > Date: Mon Apr 2 00:13:30 2012
> > New Revision: 186058
> >
> > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186058
> > Log:
> > /cp
> > 2012-04-01 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
> >
> > PR c++/50043
> > * class.c (deduce_noexcept_on_destructor,
> > deduce_noexcept_on_destructors): New.
> > (check_bases_and_members): Call the latter.
> > * decl.c (grokfndecl): Call the former.
> > * method.c (implicitly_declare_fn): Not static.
> > * cp-tree.h (deduce_noexcept_on_destructor, implicitly_declare_fn):
> > Declare
> >
> > /testsuite
> > 2012-04-01 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
> >
> > PR c++/50043
> > * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept17.C: New.
> > * g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C: Adjust.
> > * g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C: Likewise.
> > * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept01.C: Likewise.
> > * g++.dg/eh/init-temp1.C: Likewise.
> > * g++.dg/eh/ctor1.C: Likwise.
> >
> > Added:
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept17.C
> > Modified:
> > trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> > trunk/gcc/cp/class.c
> > trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> > trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
> > trunk/gcc/cp/method.c
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept01.C
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/ctor1.C
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/init-temp1.C
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-15 2:15 ` kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
@ 2014-05-05 15:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-05 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jaak at ristioja dot ee
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 61067 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-05 15:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-11 9:23 [Bug c++/50043] New: [C++0x] Implement core/1123 paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-02-21 11:55 ` [Bug c++/50043] " mimomorin at gmail dot com
2012-02-21 12:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 2:48 ` mimomorin at gmail dot com
2012-03-23 1:07 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-23 1:35 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-23 18:03 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-23 18:45 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-23 23:01 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-03-28 10:06 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-04-02 0:14 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 0:20 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-04-12 0:11 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-11 10:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-13 3:48 ` kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
2012-06-15 2:15 ` kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
2014-05-05 15:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).