From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-394347-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26794 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2012 02:15:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 26688 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2012 02:15:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:14:49 +0000
From: "kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/50043] [C++0x] Implement core/1123
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-50043-4-xL4wAT8fZZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50043-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50043-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00974.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043

--- Comment #14 from Kirby Zhou <kirbyzhou@sogou-inc.com> 2012-06-15 02:14:48 UTC ---
I have tested to apply this patch to 4.7 branch, everythings goes well.
Since it breaks already existing code, anybody can do commit backport to 4.7
branch?

(In reply to comment #13)
> How about back port this patch to 4.7 branch?
> It cause a lot of compile error which easily confuse programmers.
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Author: paolo
> > Date: Mon Apr  2 00:13:30 2012
> > New Revision: 186058
> > 
> > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186058
> > Log:
> > /cp
> > 2012-04-01  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
> > 
> >     PR c++/50043
> >     * class.c (deduce_noexcept_on_destructor,
> >     deduce_noexcept_on_destructors): New.
> >     (check_bases_and_members): Call the latter.
> >     * decl.c (grokfndecl): Call the former.
> >     * method.c (implicitly_declare_fn): Not static.
> >     * cp-tree.h (deduce_noexcept_on_destructor, implicitly_declare_fn):
> >     Declare
> > 
> > /testsuite
> > 2012-04-01  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
> > 
> >     PR c++/50043
> >     * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept17.C: New.
> >     * g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C: Adjust.
> >     * g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C: Likewise.
> >     * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept01.C: Likewise.
> >     * g++.dg/eh/init-temp1.C: Likewise.
> >     * g++.dg/eh/ctor1.C: Likwise.
> > 
> > Added:
> >     trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept17.C
> > Modified:
> >     trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> >     trunk/gcc/cp/class.c
> >     trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> >     trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
> >     trunk/gcc/cp/method.c
> >     trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >     trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept01.C
> >     trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/ctor1.C
> >     trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/init-temp1.C
> >     trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C
> >     trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C