* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-12 1:02 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-12 7:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-12 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-12 01:02:11 UTC ---
Same fail on trunk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-12 1:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/50052] " danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-12 7:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 15:29 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-12 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011-08-12
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2
Summary|[4.6 Regression] FAIL: |[4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL:
|gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c |gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c
|scan-tree-dump eipa_sra |scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-12 1:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/50052] " danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-12 7:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-03 15:29 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 15:31 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-03 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-03 15:29:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 25184
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25184
tree dump
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-03 15:29 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-03 15:31 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 15:34 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-03 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-03 15:31:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 25185
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25185
tree dump
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-03 15:31 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-03 15:34 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-09 11:46 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-03 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-03 15:33:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 25186
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25186
tree dump
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-03 15:34 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-09 11:46 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-30 9:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-09 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-09 11:45:01 UTC ---
Thanks for filing a bug for the issue which is a problem for all
strict-alignment platforms, not just hppa. We have been discussing
this already about a month ago, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00931.html
together with the preceeding thread and the reply I am about to post.
Meanwhile I assign this to myself.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-09 11:46 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-30 9:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-09-30 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|hppa*-*-* |hppa*-*-*, alpha-dec-osf*,
| |mips-sgi-irix*,
| |sparc-sun-solaris*
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Host|hppa*-*-* |hppa*-*-*, alpha-dec-osf*,
| |mips-sgi-irix*,
| |sparc-sun-solaris*
Build|hppa*-*-* |hppa*-*-*, alpha-dec-osf*,
| |mips-sgi-irix*,
| |sparc-sun-solaris*
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-30 09:42:22 UTC ---
Also affects Solaris/SPARC, Tru64 UNIX (Alpha), and IRIX (MIPS). Since this is
unfixed for about 2 months, could the tests please be XFAILed on
strict-alignment
targets to reduce the noise?
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-09-30 9:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-10-26 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-27 9:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-26 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-26 17:13:21 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.2 is being released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-10-26 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-10-27 9:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-01 14:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-27 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-10-27 9:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-01 14:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-26 15:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-26 15:58 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-01 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-01 14:38:08 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.3 is being released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-01 14:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-26 15:55 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-26 15:58 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-26 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-26 15:46:22 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Mar 26 15:46:14 2012
New Revision: 185807
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185807
Log:
2012-03-26 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR tree-optimization/50052
* tree-sra.c (tree_non_aligned_mem_p): Removed.
(tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p): Likewise.
(build_accesses_from_assign): Removed strict alignment requirements
checks.
(access_precludes_ipa_sra_p): Likewise.
* testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c: Also run on strict-alignment
platforms.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c
trunk/gcc/tree-sra.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra
2011-08-11 23:32 [Bug tree-optimization/50052] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-26 15:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-26 15:58 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-26 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-26 15:53:11 UTC ---
The testcase is currently not being run on strict-alignment platforms
on the 4.6 and 4.7 branches and passes fine on trunk. Backporting the
misalignment expansion changes that allowed is not planned.
Thus, this PR can be finally closed as fixed. Thank you for your
patience.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread