public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:29:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-50091-4-J2I2klMMiS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-50091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-04 15:28:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Defining STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN to 1 for Darwin would be a separate thing. > In particular, you'd need to test Ada to validate this change. indeed, lucky I finally figured out how to get Ada to bootstrap on powerpc-darwin9 then ;-) (FTR, STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN is OK on i686-darwin9 and x86-64-darwin10 is running) > > ... running check again ... ... the tests were OK with the c-family + fortran (STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN + comment 12). I'm about to reg-strap w/Ada & java to check various WIP.. (long job, don't expect an answer today) ..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-04 15:29 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-08-15 15:26 [Bug target/50091] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-16 8:42 ` [Bug target/50091] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-16 17:23 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-16 17:28 ` pinskia at gmail dot com 2011-08-17 22:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-20 14:22 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-20 14:52 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2011-09-03 13:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-03 14:20 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-03 14:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-03 14:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-03 16:48 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-03 17:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 11:19 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 13:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 15:29 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-09-18 22:04 ` [Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check generates wrong assembly ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-18 22:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-18 22:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-18 23:32 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-50091-4-J2I2klMMiS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).