public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-50091-4-zeHAhCdWQQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-50091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091

--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-04 13:02:15 UTC ---
> for a smaller frame ... and the asm looks sensible...

Great, thanks.

Defining STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN to 1 for Darwin would be a separate thing.
In particular, you'd need to test Ada to validate this change.

> ... running check again ... but I'd hazard that this is fairly safe (at least,
> from the darwin perspective).   However, I'm not able to check ppc linux here, 
> as things stand.

I'll give it a whirl on PowerPC/Linux.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-04 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-15 15:26 [Bug target/50091] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-08-16  8:42 ` [Bug target/50091] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-16 17:23 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-16 17:28 ` pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-08-17 22:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-08-20 14:22 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-20 14:52 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2011-09-03 13:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 14:20 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 14:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 14:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 16:48 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-03 17:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-04 11:19 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-04 13:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2011-09-04 15:29 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-18 22:04 ` [Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check generates wrong assembly ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-18 22:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-18 22:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-18 23:32 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-50091-4-zeHAhCdWQQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).