From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-365635-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12196 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2011 08:42:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 12186 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2011 08:42:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:42:25 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/50092] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.4.7
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Known to work Target Milestone Summary Ever Confirmed Known to fail
Message-ID: <bug-50092-4-0EU6nbX6sI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50092-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50092-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg01409.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50092

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-08-16
      Known to work|                            |4.3.6
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.7
            Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7
                   |elimination_costs_in_insn,  |Regression] internal
                   |at reload1.c:3633           |compiler error: in
                   |                            |elimination_costs_in_insn,
                   |                            |at reload1.c:3633
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-16 08:42:04 UTC ---
Confirmed.  Reduced testcase:

int main(int argc, char **argv) 
{
  int i;
  _Complex long double vector[100000000];
  for (i=0 ; i<10 ; i++)
    printf("Valor: %Lf\n", (long double) rand()/ 2147483648.0);
  printf ("La posicion 5 tiene el valor: %Le\n", (long double) vector[5]);
} 


ICEs in various ways depending on optimization level.  With -m32 the
array is diagnosed as being too large.  At -O1:

t.3.i: In function 'main':
t.3.i:6:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function
'printf' [enabled by default]
t.3.i:8:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 46 15 18 3 (parallel [
            (set (reg:XF 71)
                (float:XF (reg:SI 63 [ D.2730 ])))
            (clobber (mem/c:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)
                        (const_int -3200000004 [0xffffffff4143dffc])) [0 S4
A32]))
        ]) t.3.i:6 -1
     (nil))
t.3.i:8:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2115
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

4.3 is happy with the code.